Free Essays on Nuclear Weapons

Nuclear Weapons The controlling of nuclear weapons dates back to the first ineffective arms negotiations at the, â€Å"Hague Conferences which took place in 1899 and 1907,†1 as stated by Tom Bethell in his article â€Å"No Nukes America†. Many conferences such as the Hague Conference, have set a standard to the limitation of nuclear weapons throughout the world. Mr Bethell claims that, â€Å"Ever since the end of the Cold War, the threat of nuclear warfare has declined,†1 despite the fact that at any second, any country can be destroyed with the push of a single button. Nuclear weapons are probably the biggest threat in the world today. The belief that there should be nuclear weapons in the world is supported by Tom Bethell who is a Washington correspondent for the American Spectator. Mr. Bethell basically writes about how the U.S. has practically stopped the production of nuclear weapons. He also explains that now that the U.S. has delayed production, they are behind in the technological aspect of nuclear weapons compared to other nuclear weapon countries. Mr. Bethell states the stoppage of testing by saying, â€Å"The refusal to allow further testing ensures that nuclear weapons technology will become increasingly outdated.†1 Mr. Bethell also claims that because of the shut down of the plants, the, â€Å"Weapons plants were stigmatized as contaminated sites, ‘hot spots,’ sources of hazardous waste.†1 Also, Mr. Bethell states that, â€Å"The Department of Energy has estimated that cleaning up these sites will cost $300 billion – more than the annual defense budget.†1 Mr. Bethell’s main point of the article is that because of the closing of the plants, and the stoppage of the testings of nuclear weapons, the U.S. will feel less secure because they will be so far behind the major nuclear countries (Russia, France, China) in the technological aspect of nuclear weapons. Mr. Bethell asks the question, â€Å"Will we feel more... Free Essays on Nuclear Weapons Free Essays on Nuclear Weapons Nuclear Weapons The controlling of nuclear weapons dates back to the first ineffective arms negotiations at the, â€Å"Hague Conferences which took place in 1899 and 1907,†1 as stated by Tom Bethell in his article â€Å"No Nukes America†. Many conferences such as the Hague Conference, have set a standard to the limitation of nuclear weapons throughout the world. Mr Bethell claims that, â€Å"Ever since the end of the Cold War, the threat of nuclear warfare has declined,†1 despite the fact that at any second, any country can be destroyed with the push of a single button. Nuclear weapons are probably the biggest threat in the world today. The belief that there should be nuclear weapons in the world is supported by Tom Bethell who is a Washington correspondent for the American Spectator. Mr. Bethell basically writes about how the U.S. has practically stopped the production of nuclear weapons. He also explains that now that the U.S. has delayed production, they are behind in the technological aspect of nuclear weapons compared to other nuclear weapon countries. Mr. Bethell states the stoppage of testing by saying, â€Å"The refusal to allow further testing ensures that nuclear weapons technology will become increasingly outdated.†1 Mr. Bethell also claims that because of the shut down of the plants, the, â€Å"Weapons plants were stigmatized as contaminated sites, ‘hot spots,’ sources of hazardous waste.†1 Also, Mr. Bethell states that, â€Å"The Department of Energy has estimated that cleaning up these sites will cost $300 billion – more than the annual defense budget.†1 Mr. Bethell’s main point of the article is that because of the closing of the plants, and the stoppage of the testings of nuclear weapons, the U.S. will feel less secure because they will be so far behind the major nuclear countries (Russia, France, China) in the technological aspect of nuclear weapons. Mr. Bethell asks the question, â€Å"Will we feel more... Free Essays on Nuclear Weapons Argument: States coexist in anarchy and the self-help principal action in an anarchic order is gained by security Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Defense equates to an ideal security since this combination presents both a strong guard in the presence of an attack while conversely equally strong prevention in terms of the effective punishment for the aggressor (anticipation of threat must be genuine). â€Å"Why fight if you can’t win much and might lose everything?†-exemplifies the authors mind frame in terms of the existence of nuclear weapons in war mentality. The concept of certainty becomes definable when using nuclear weapons in war. In conventional war an aggressor would pose war knowing that although uncertain about the outcome, destruction will be limited. With the introduction of nuclear warheads however the state and surrounding areas would be annihilated-with certainty! The knowledge of their being a severe outcome with the use of nuclear weapons, states would focus on avoidance when approaching the thought of war. Fear of nuclear weapons falling into wrong hands are unfounded due to the nature of a nuclear attack Use with â€Å"blackmail† would be a â€Å"cheap and decisive offensive force against conventional enemies† Theoretical Perspective and Why: Waltz is arguing from a realist theoretical perspective mainly because of his views on conflict. His essay is based around the use of nuclear weapons as a means to participate with other states in conflict. Where a Liberal Plurist would seek to explore cooperation and communication Waltz’s realist account sees the use of â€Å"blackmail† with nuclear weapon as an â€Å"offensive force†. Defining terminology for a realist emphasizes, â€Å"States, Power and Anarchy†. Waltz asserts that, â€Å"States coexist in a condition of anarchy†¦states must help themselves by providing for their own security†. His argument furthermore reflects the c...